Skip to the content
  • Why Vertex
    • Expertise in Education
    • Your Trusted Partner
    • Humanitix Case Study
    • Give Back
    • Careers
  • Penetration Testing
  • ISO27001
  • Cyber Training
  • Solutions
    • Cyber Security Audit
    • Incident Response
    • Managed Services
  • News
  • Contact
  • Why Vertex
    • Expertise in Education
    • Your Trusted Partner
    • Humanitix Case Study
    • Give Back
    • Careers
  • Penetration Testing
  • ISO27001
  • Cyber Training
  • Solutions
    • Cyber Security Audit
    • Incident Response
    • Managed Services
  • News
  • Contact
LOG IN

Delta vs. CrowdStrike: A High-Stakes Legal Battle with Billions at Stake

Delta Air Lines’ lawsuit against CrowdStrike is a calculated legal offensive, carefully crafted to exploit vulnerabilities in the cybersecurity giant’s defences and inflict maximum financial and reputational damage. This isn’t just about recovering losses; it’s about setting a precedent and sending a message to the entire cybersecurity industry.

Here’s how Delta is strategically positioning its legal attack:

1. Weaponising the “Hacking” Allegation:

  • Delta is leveraging Georgia’s anti-hacking statute, a powerful legal tool that carries significant penalties. By framing CrowdStrike’s faulty update as an act of “hacking,” Delta aims to bypass the usual legal protections enjoyed by software vendors. This bold move, if successful, could redefine the legal landscape for cybersecurity companies.

2. Highlighting CrowdStrike’s “Broken Promises”:

  • Delta is directly challenging CrowdStrike’s marketing claims, arguing that the company failed to deliver on its promises of robust security and reliable software. This strategy aims to undermine CrowdStrike’s credibility and expose the gap between its marketing rhetoric and the reality of its product’s performance.

3. Exploiting the Scale of the Disaster:

  • Delta is emphasising the widespread impact of the outage, which affected not only its own operations but also millions of computers worldwide. This tactic serves to amplify the severity of CrowdStrike’s alleged negligence and bolster Delta’s claim for substantial damages.

4. Seeking Maximum Financial Penalties:

  • Delta isn’t just seeking to recoup its direct losses; it’s going for the jugular. The lawsuit demands compensation for lost revenue, reputational damage, and future losses, signalling Delta’s intent to extract a hefty price from CrowdStrike.

5. Setting a Precedent for the Industry:

  • Delta’s aggressive legal strategy could have far-reaching consequences for the cybersecurity industry. If successful, it could force companies to be more accountable for their products and claims, potentially leading to greater transparency and stricter standards across the board.

In essence, Delta’s lawsuit is a carefully calculated legal offensive designed to inflict maximum damage on CrowdStrike. Delta Vs. CrowdStrike is a high-stakes battle that could reshape the cybersecurity landscape and redefine the rules of engagement for the entire industry.

Contact our team of experts at Vertex Cyber Security for assistance with all your cyber security needs.

For further reading on CrowdStrike and Delta Air Lines click here.

CATEGORIES

Press

TAGS

delta v crowdstrike - legal

SHARE

PrevPreviousPenetration Testing for E-commerce Websites
NextISO 27001 ImplementationNext

Follow Us!

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Instagram
Cyber Security by Vertex, Sydney Australia

Your partner in Cyber Security.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Accreditations & Certifications

blank
blank
blank
blank
blank
  • 1300 229 237
  • Suite 13.04 189 Kent Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia
  • 121 King St, Melbourne VIC 3000
  • Lot Fourteen, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5000
  • Level 2/315 Brunswick St, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, Adelaide SA 5000

(c) 2025 Vertex Technologies Pty Ltd.

download (2)
download (4)

We acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the traditional custodians of this land and pay our respects to their Ancestors and Elders, past, present and future. We acknowledge and respect the continuing culture of the Gadigal people of the Eora nation and their unique cultural and spiritual relationships to the land, waters and seas.

We acknowledge that sovereignty of this land was never ceded. Always was, always will be Aboriginal land.