Skip to the content
  • Why Vertex
    • Your Trusted Partner
    • Humanitix Case Study
    • Give Back
    • Careers
  • Penetration Testing
  • ISO27001
  • Cyber Training
  • Solutions
    • Startups, Scaleups & FinTechs
    • Small & Medium Enterprises
    • Expertise in Education
    • Cyber Security Audit
    • Incident Response
    • Managed Services
  • News
  • Contact
  • Why Vertex
    • Your Trusted Partner
    • Humanitix Case Study
    • Give Back
    • Careers
  • Penetration Testing
  • ISO27001
  • Cyber Training
  • Solutions
    • Startups, Scaleups & FinTechs
    • Small & Medium Enterprises
    • Expertise in Education
    • Cyber Security Audit
    • Incident Response
    • Managed Services
  • News
  • Contact
LOG IN

Scaling Walls: Why New Research Shows AI is Hitting Its Limits

The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence has been nothing short of extraordinary. Over the last few years, we have seen models grow in size, complexity, and capability at an exponential rate. However, recent research and industry observations suggest that the current trajectory of AI development—simply making models larger and feeding them more data—may be hitting a significant wall.

As businesses consider how to integrate AI into their long-term strategies, it is important to understand that the next generation of frontier models might require vastly more investment for only fractional improvements in performance.

The Problem with Scaling: More is Not Always Better

For a long time, the prevailing wisdom in the AI industry was that increasing the number of parameters and the volume of training data would lead to a corresponding increase in intelligence. While this held true for several years, we are now seeing the emergence of the “Law of Diminishing Returns”.

A significant paper from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) titled “AI: Why ‘Meek,’ Low-Budget Models Could Soon Match High-Budget Performance”, released on 30th January 2026, highlights a growing concern. The study demonstrates that as top-tier models face decreasing returns to compute scaling, the performance gap between high-budget and more modestly resourced “meek” models is shrinking. We are reaching a point where a model that costs exponentially more to train may only perform a few percentage points better than its predecessor on key benchmarks like the MMLU.

Averaging and the Loss of Detail

The core of the issue lies in how Large Language Models (LLMs) learn. These systems are designed to predict the next most likely word or concept based on vast datasets. In doing so, they often rely on “averaging” the information they receive.

As we discussed in our previous post on 24th October 2025, Why Your AI Chatbot Sounds So Average and Why It Matters, this reliance on the “most likely” outcome leads to a plateau in quality. The recent MIT research reinforces this, pointing out that even when models are trained on large amounts of data, choosing the “best average model” can lead to failures in specific settings where high average performance hides individual errors. This creates a ceiling where performance flattens out regardless of the additional compute power applied.

The Economic Reality for Businesses

In our previous discussions regarding the “Fast, Cheap, Quality” triangle, we noted that you cannot have all three. In the context of AI, we are seeing a shift where “Fast and Quality” is becoming extraordinarily expensive.

For an organisation, this means that the most expensive AI tool on the market may not necessarily provide a significant competitive advantage over a well-optimised, mid-sized model. If the current pathway leads to models that are larger and more expensive but only fractionally better, the focus for businesses should shift from “bigger is better” to “smarter and more efficient is better”.

Strategies for a Stronger AI Posture

Rather than waiting for a “perfect” all-knowing AI that may never arrive, organisations should consider focusing on how they implement current technologies:

  • Data Quality Over Quantity: Instead of relying on a model to know everything, consider focusing on high-quality, proprietary data through methods like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG).
  • Specialised Models: Consider implementing smaller models that are fine-tuned for specific business tasks, which can be faster and more cost-effective.
  • Security-First Integration: As AI models become more integrated into business processes, the surface area for cyber attacks increases. Protecting the data that feeds these models is just as important as the output they produce.

How Vertex Can Help

Navigating the rapidly shifting landscape of AI and cybersecurity requires a balanced approach. At Vertex, we help businesses understand the risks and rewards of new technologies, ensuring that your path toward innovation does not compromise your security posture.

If you are looking for expert guidance on how to secure your AI implementations or wish to discuss a tailored cybersecurity strategy for your organisation, please contact the team at Vertex Cyber Security for more information.

CATEGORIES

AI

TAGS

AI scaling - artificial intelligence costs - cybersecurity for AI - diminishing returns AI - MIT AI research 2026

SHARE

SUBSCRIBE

PrevPreviousHow to Achieve the Cheapest ISO 27001 Certification Without the DIY Disaster
NextThe Passion Deficit: Why the Global Pursuit of AI Profits is Starving Human CreativityNext

Follow Us!

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Instagram
Cyber Security by Vertex, Sydney Australia

Your partner in Cyber Security.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Accreditations & Certifications

blank
blank
blank
  • 1300 229 237
  • Suite 10 30 Atchison Street St Leonards NSW 2065
  • 477 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000
  • 121 King St, Melbourne VIC 3000
  • Lot Fourteen, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5000
  • Level 2/315 Brunswick St, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, Adelaide SA 5000

(c) 2026 Vertex Technologies Pty Ltd (ABN: 67 611 787 029). Vertex is a private company (beneficially owned by the Boyd Family Trust).

download (2)
download (4)

We acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the traditional custodians of this land and pay our respects to their Ancestors and Elders, past, present and future. We acknowledge and respect the continuing culture of the Gadigal people of the Eora nation and their unique cultural and spiritual relationships to the land, waters and seas.

We acknowledge that sovereignty of this land was never ceded. Always was, always will be Aboriginal land.