Skip to the content
  • Why Vertex
    • Your Trusted Partner
    • Humanitix Case Study
    • Give Back
    • Careers
  • Penetration Testing
  • ISO27001
  • Cyber Training
  • Solutions
    • Startups, Scaleups & FinTechs
    • Small & Medium Enterprises
    • Expertise in Education
    • Cyber Security Audit
    • Incident Response
    • Managed Services
  • News
  • Contact
  • Why Vertex
    • Your Trusted Partner
    • Humanitix Case Study
    • Give Back
    • Careers
  • Penetration Testing
  • ISO27001
  • Cyber Training
  • Solutions
    • Startups, Scaleups & FinTechs
    • Small & Medium Enterprises
    • Expertise in Education
    • Cyber Security Audit
    • Incident Response
    • Managed Services
  • News
  • Contact
LOG IN

Rationalising Cyber Security: What Will Your Decision Look Like After a Breach?

When making strategic decisions for your organisation, it is common to weigh costs, benefits, and timelines. However, when it comes to cyber security, there is an additional perspective you must consider: the perspective of an auditor, a disgruntled client, or even the hacker themselves after a successful attack has occurred.

If your current justification for a security decision feels flimsy now, it will look significantly worse under the microscope of a post-incident investigation.

The Danger of Overconfidence

A common sentiment with executives and in the boardrooms is the belief that “our staff are too smart to be fooled” or “I would never click on a phishing link.” This is a dangerous rationalisation. Modern cyber attacks are not always obvious or poorly written. They are often highly targeted, sophisticated, and designed to exploit human psychology under pressure.

Relying on the perceived intelligence of your team rather than implementing robust technical controls, such as multi-factor authentication and advanced email filtering, leaves your business vulnerable. In the event of a breach, “we thought we were too smart to be hacked” will not be a valid defence to your stakeholders or regulators.

The True Cost of the “Cheap Option”

In project management, there is a well-known principle: you can have it fast, cheap, or high quality, but you can only ever choose two. If a cyber security solution is both fast and cheap, it almost certainly lacks the quality required to provide genuine protection.

Choosing a provider or a software package based solely on the lowest price may satisfy a budget in the short term, but it often results in “cyber lipstick” a surface-level appearance of security that offers no real resilience. If a breach occurs, explaining to investors that you chose the cheapest possible protection to save a small percentage of the budget will likely be viewed as a failure of fiduciary duty.

The Proposal Trap

Another common pitfall is making significant security investments based on a few vague sentences in a proposal or a slick sales pitch. Cyber security is a deeply technical and complex field. A proposal that lacks detail regarding specific controls, methodology, and ongoing support is a red flag.

Decisions should be based on a thorough understanding of your organisation’s specific risk profile. If your rationalisation for hiring a firm is simply that “they seemed like they knew what they were doing,” you may find yourself with a partner who lacks the expertise to handle a real-world crisis.

The DIY Risk

With the abundance of online resources, some businesses decide to implement security frameworks or manage their own infrastructure with limited internal expertise. While taking initiative is positive, cyber security is not a field where “good enough” suffices.

Small mistakes in configuration or a lack of understanding of technical requirements can leave wide-open backdoors for attackers. If your business suffers a total loss, the justification that “it didn’t look too hard to do ourselves” will provide little comfort to the employees and families whose livelihoods are impacted by the closure of the business.

Considering the Consequences

A successful cyber attack can be an existential event. It is not just about the immediate financial loss; it is about the loss of reputation, the legal ramifications, and the potential end of the company. When you are deciding on your next security project or choosing a partner, ask yourself if your reasoning would hold up during a public inquiry or a legal challenge.

Genuine security is about quality implementation, expert guidance, and a proactive approach to risk.

How Vertex Can Assist

Navigating these complex decisions requires a partner who prioritises high-quality protection over quick fixes. At Vertex, we focus on delivering expert penetration testing, comprehensive audits, and tailored managed services that provide real-world resilience.

If you are looking to move beyond simple rationalisations and want to build a truly secure foundation for your business, contact the expert team at Vertex today for a confidential discussion or visit our website for further resources.

CATEGORIES

Uncategorised

TAGS

SHARE

SUBSCRIBE

PrevPreviousWhy You Should Stop Spending Thousands on Cyber Compliance Platforms

Follow Us!

Facebook Twitter Linkedin Instagram
Cyber Security by Vertex, Sydney Australia

Your partner in Cyber Security.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

Accreditations & Certifications

blank
blank
blank
  • 1300 229 237
  • Suite 10 30 Atchison Street St Leonards NSW 2065
  • 477 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000
  • 121 King St, Melbourne VIC 3000
  • Lot Fourteen, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5000
  • Level 2/315 Brunswick St, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, Adelaide SA 5000

(c) 2026 Vertex Technologies Pty Ltd (ABN: 67 611 787 029). Vertex is a private company (beneficially owned by the Boyd Family Trust).

download (2)
download (4)

We acknowledge Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the traditional custodians of this land and pay our respects to their Ancestors and Elders, past, present and future. We acknowledge and respect the continuing culture of the Gadigal people of the Eora nation and their unique cultural and spiritual relationships to the land, waters and seas.

We acknowledge that sovereignty of this land was never ceded. Always was, always will be Aboriginal land.